But it’s complicated, required deadlines vary by Class and for all devices. You need to take action now or risk having no product to sell.
Under EU Medical Device Regulations (MDR) of 2017, all medical devices have to conform to the new regulations by the end of the current transition period on May 26, 2024, But because, among other things, Notified Bodies suffer from capacity problems to certify old and new medical devices, there is a risk that at the end of the current transition period, a large number of devices will no longer be available to EU patients.
A decision to extend the implementation period has therefore been taken and it officially comes into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the EU, which is expected before the end of March 2023.
Note: As emphasized in our ISO 13485 training courses, compliance with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, as applicable, is a requirement of ISO 13485 compliance.
The changes include an extension of the time periods in Article 120(2), (3) and (4) MDR and are summarised as…
For part of the Class I products, the (old) transitional period until 26 May 2024, which is regulated in Article 120(1) MDR, remains in place (see MDCG 2020-2 rev. 1, Class I Transitional provisions under Article 120 (3 and 4) – (MDR)).
With more than 10,000 types of medical device available to patients over multiple classifications, it would be impossible for a post such as this to cover all possibilities. Our purpose is to advise you of the deadlines that will now apply together with identifying (in the Explanatory Notes) the issues most likely to hinder you in complying with the EU Regulations within the time available.
You must develop (or update) a plan for compliance with the Regulations. And you are strongly advised to get professional Regulatory Affairs support in preparing and implementing that plan.
Device Class |
Action |
Deadline |
CE Mark by |
Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
All |
Establish a quality management system in accordance with Article 10(9) MDR |
26-May-24 |
Various |
ISO 13485 certification is the de facto requirement here |
Class III, IIb & IIa |
Submit formal application in accordance with Annex VII to the MDR for conformity assessment |
26-May-24 |
Notified Body |
Previous willingness by a Notified Body to accept an application must be established. |
Class III, IIb & IIa |
Signed agreement between Notified Body and the Manufacturer |
26-Sep-24 |
Notified Body |
|
Class III Customized |
MDR-compliant CE Mark Certificate |
31-Dec-26 |
Notified Body |
|
Class IIb |
MDR-compliant CE Mark Certificate |
31-Dec-27 |
Notified Body |
|
Class III |
MDR-compliant CE Mark Certificate |
31-Dec-27 |
Notified Body |
|
Class I |
MDR-compliant CE Mark Certificate |
31-Dec-28 |
Self-declared |
Follow MDCG 2020-2 rev. 1 - Class I Transitional provisions under Article 120 (3 and 4) - (MDR) |
Class IIa |
MDR-compliant CE Mark Certificate |
31-Dec-28 |
Notified Body |
|
MDR-compliant CE Mark Certificate extensions: These deadline extensions will be dependent on the fulfillment of several conditions and the extension of the validity of current MDD and AIMDD CE certificates that would only apply to devices…
Continuing to meet the requirements of EU-MDR for legacy devices: To maintain compliance with EU-MDR during the extended transition period, you must…
EUDAMED will have six Modules, namely,
The first three of these are already available for use and you are recommended to start uploading data as soon as possible.
The deadlines here remain as given in our Post: IVDR Transition Deadline extended up to 2027 – reality bites.
The extension given is to facilitate the work of Notified Bodies and provide a reasonable opportunity for them to clear the backlog of CE Mark applications. It is not for the benefit of manufacturers or their EU representatives. If you doubt this, look again at the table of deadlines. If you’ve not already done so, you need to take action now. Some Notified Bodies are reported to be refusing new applications. So, don’t get caught out!
We have chosen ISO 21001 certification because, unlike IRCA and Exemplar badges (which in our opinion are commercially compromised), it is based on independent third-party assessment. It is a ‘university grade’ standard in use globally by schools, colleges, and universities to demonstrate their competence.